marycatelli: (Golden Hair)
marycatelli ([personal profile] marycatelli) wrote2013-10-18 11:44 pm
Entry tags:

philosophical reflections on reading fiction for fiction writers

Ran across a comment recently wherein someone said that he stuck to read SF because that was what he was writing.

This is imprudent.

All right, he added it was for market research, but even for that it's imprudent.  There's too much of a gap between when you read and when you might conceivably get published.

But reading is good for other reasons.  It helps you absorb tricks of the trade and the like.  And reading outside your genre is particularly important because such works have the tricks and the twists and the things that are not familiar within your genre.  Cross-pollinating is healthy.  It also helps prepare you for plots and characters unusual in your genre by increasing the variety of models you can draw on.
bratfarrar: A woman wearing a paper hat over her eyes and holding a teacup (Default)

[personal profile] bratfarrar 2013-10-19 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I wasn't thinking so much of using antique fiction (to distinguish it from 'historic fiction' as a genre) as source material for details as for the underlying cultural understandings. The knights in medieval romances, the lords and ladies of Elizabethan drama, the heroes of Homer, all value things we don't. They interact with each other in ways that we find strange and at times inexplicable. Their understanding of how the universe works is different from ours (not that we now all agree on everything, but we're at least using pretty much the same vocabulary).

Um. Does this distinction make sense?
bratfarrar: A woman wearing a paper hat over her eyes and holding a teacup (Default)

[personal profile] bratfarrar 2013-10-20 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Sooo... I think we're basically saying the same thing, just a little differently.