I started with a "what if", namely "what if a world had functional witchcraft?"
To call this "insist[ing] that the limitations of your sub-creation be that of reality" when you "don't believe in real world magic" is -- err -- gibberish. To say nothing stronger about it.
"In any world where magic works, it will have an impact on people and society."
And the impact will depend on HOW it works, in which the world-builder has a lot of leeway.
"Using some of it will earn you a stiff penalty, not because you are committing fraud, but becuase you are making people do things they would not otherwise do."
Only if you are caught. Which is the question at hand.
"When magic works we call it technology. "
Only magica. Not goetia or theurgia.
"My point in all this is, accept your world as it is, but don't expect it to conform to your expectations"
My very own imaginary world, built by me for my very own purposes, is going to conform to my expectations. It could hardly do otherwise. I'm the author.
"The people of that world may have ideas as to how things work, that doesn't mean they are going to be rigth."
Moot point. The author has to know how and whether they can detect witchcraft and defend themselves against it. Otherwise the world-building will be too weak to support the story.
"So let your characters be wrong, for how they undeerstand their world depends on what they know, and what they know depends on what they learned as children."
Only it makes a good story for that to come back and bite them. Because -- remember the what-if? -- having false ideas about whether they can detect and defend against witchcraft is really going to bite them. Hard.
no subject
I started with a "what if", namely "what if a world had functional witchcraft?"
To call this "insist[ing] that the limitations of your sub-creation be that of reality" when you "don't believe in real world magic" is -- err -- gibberish. To say nothing stronger about it.
"In any world where magic works, it will have an impact on people and society."
And the impact will depend on HOW it works, in which the world-builder has a lot of leeway.
"Using some of it will earn you a stiff penalty, not because you are committing fraud, but becuase you are making people do things they would not otherwise do."
Only if you are caught. Which is the question at hand.
"When magic works we call it technology. "
Only magica. Not goetia or theurgia.
"My point in all this is, accept your world as it is, but don't expect it to conform to your expectations"
My very own imaginary world, built by me for my very own purposes, is going to conform to my expectations. It could hardly do otherwise. I'm the author.
"The people of that world may have ideas as to how things work, that doesn't mean they are going to be rigth."
Moot point. The author has to know how and whether they can detect witchcraft and defend themselves against it. Otherwise the world-building will be too weak to support the story.
"So let your characters be wrong, for how they undeerstand their world depends on what they know, and what they know depends on what they learned as children."
Only it makes a good story for that to come back and bite them. Because -- remember the what-if? -- having false ideas about whether they can detect and defend against witchcraft is really going to bite them. Hard.