marycatelli: (Default)
[personal profile] marycatelli
It has its interesting aspects.

For one thing -- well, you can define an epic as a "lengthy narrative poem." You can define a lyric as a "short poem expressing emotions." But you have to define a sonnet as "a poem of fourteen lines using any of a number of formal rhyme schemes,". Superheroes face much the same problem.

You can define science fiction as that branch of fiction that attempts suspension of disbelief by appeal to the authority of science. And fantasy as, hmm, that branch of fiction that attempts suspension of disbelief by appeal to the authority of folklore and legend. But superheroes, you have to start talking about superpowers, funny costumes, secret identities and crime-fighting.  (Come to think of it, modern setting is also characteristic.  I wonder if an ancient or medieval superhero is really feasible.)  You can get recognizable superheroes with mitigated forms of those, or missing one or two, but they clearly will be less typical forms.

I was thinking that one aspect was a diversity of origins.  You can have Iron Man, but if all your characters wear high-powered armor, you have mecha, not superheroes.  You can have Doctor Strange, but if all your characters are wizards, even if they wear fancy get-ups, you have urban fantasy, not superheroes.

DC and Marvel of course accreted a mad medley of origins over decades.  Many writers of their own little superuniverses tend to introduce a metaorigin -- but not an common origin.  Once the metaorigin started to produce supers, they actually gained powers in many of various ways, and getting many and various powersets.

BUT -- that variety would preclude a superhero story where there's only one or two superpowered people.  I have run across those.  Hmmm.  They do tend to be oddball origins that are clearly not typically fantasy, but if science fictional, very soft science.  Perhaps I have not seen enough to judge.

Date: 2021-09-11 11:49 am (UTC)
madfilkentist: Obama posing in front of a Superman statue, with added text: "No, you can't." (obama)
From: [personal profile] madfilkentist
It's not a "diversity of origins" as such, but rather that a superhero has to stand above everyone else in some respect. Iron Man is a superhero because his suit lets him do things no one else can do. You can have a Justice League or Legion of Superheroes, but each one has to stand out above everyone else in some aspect. If you have a lot of people with the same unusual abilities, none standing out above the others, they cease to be superheroes.

Ancient superheroes: Hercules could be considered a superhero except for his ancient setting. Wagner's Siegfried doesn't seem to qualify either, in spite of his Aesir ancestry, Achilles-like invulnerability, and ability to understand the meaning of birds and liars. Thor changed his job title from god to superhero when he entered the modern age. So I guess being modern is a requirement.

Profile

marycatelli: (Default)
marycatelli

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 23 45 67
89 10 11 12 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 14th, 2026 03:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios