philosophical examples
Sep. 8th, 2022 10:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
marycatelliYou know if I have heroes debating justice and one brings up other, less justified vigilantes than the other hero. . . .
It just might be wise to have vigilantes in the story beforehand?
Not the lynch mob. Indeed, I think the vigilante will bring up that he was attacked by a lynch mob that unreasonably believed that he worked for an evil wizard before he was ever a vigilante himself so it pre-exists his influence.
Feuds hit the same problem.
And of course, he needs to have magic because otherwise it is unlikely that the law-and-order hero would have been brought in for the fight.
I think I shall have a wizard who attacked one whom he thinks unjustly did not do something for him as a student. Perhaps he was expelled from the apprenticeship.
And perhaps another to attack his apprentice who left him with claims of theft or perhaps lack of service according to the bond.
It just might be wise to have vigilantes in the story beforehand?
Not the lynch mob. Indeed, I think the vigilante will bring up that he was attacked by a lynch mob that unreasonably believed that he worked for an evil wizard before he was ever a vigilante himself so it pre-exists his influence.
Feuds hit the same problem.
And of course, he needs to have magic because otherwise it is unlikely that the law-and-order hero would have been brought in for the fight.
I think I shall have a wizard who attacked one whom he thinks unjustly did not do something for him as a student. Perhaps he was expelled from the apprenticeship.
And perhaps another to attack his apprentice who left him with claims of theft or perhaps lack of service according to the bond.