talk, talk, talk
Sep. 16th, 2022 11:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
marycatelliTwo heroes talk. About justice, prudence, judgment, the limits of human knowledge.
Then a heroine interrupts to suggest that instead of wasting all their time as if they could settle what sages never have been able to, they should administer some justice. Since they probably can do so in a matter that will satisfy both their views.
Now, the question is, do they talk about the issues more than once, at different times? Before this? After this? Both?
Hmmm -- this should be the last serious one. That gives her words their full impact, and they admit the -- ta-da -- justice of what she says.
Before? Very likely, and might be wise to break up the dialog. However in character and important to their tactics, it is a philosophical debate. Since she won't break up the earlier ones, to keep the last one at full strength, I suppose -- hmm -- they will have to be interrupted. They are, after all, both just.
Then a heroine interrupts to suggest that instead of wasting all their time as if they could settle what sages never have been able to, they should administer some justice. Since they probably can do so in a matter that will satisfy both their views.
Now, the question is, do they talk about the issues more than once, at different times? Before this? After this? Both?
Hmmm -- this should be the last serious one. That gives her words their full impact, and they admit the -- ta-da -- justice of what she says.
Before? Very likely, and might be wise to break up the dialog. However in character and important to their tactics, it is a philosophical debate. Since she won't break up the earlier ones, to keep the last one at full strength, I suppose -- hmm -- they will have to be interrupted. They are, after all, both just.