Date: 2013-01-04 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com
Ok, I'm confused. It seems to me that you're suggesting that, because books like Basic Economics are unlikely to be found in libraries, we shouldn't start stocking them in libraries? Help me out here.

As for being put off from reading, I've got my doubts about that entire notion. It seems like adults making excuses for student laziness or cultural issues. Students are put off because we keep telling them they should be.

Date: 2013-01-05 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com
Ah. That's true. I am making the assumption that the law will be followed. If not, then it seems "no harm, no foul."

Date: 2013-01-05 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com
As per the article, there is no mention of any particular texts being required, only examples of informational texts. I find it rather disingenuous that I am being asked to defend the most extreme forms of that type book. Were I to handle this debate as you are, I would be pretending that your view of the law required that our history books be thrown out in favor of 50 Shades of Gray.

Date: 2013-01-05 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com
That is also aside from the point being discussed, which was fiction vs. non-fiction.

Date: 2013-01-05 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com
That is not supported by the text of the article.

Profile

marycatelli: (Default)
marycatelli

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 01:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios