obviously

Dec. 20th, 2012 09:23 pm
marycatelli: (Default)
Reading back in time to rip off research history for use in fiction often means you happen on stuff that is not immediately intuitively obvious why they do it that way.

The fun part is that there are two reasons why it might be so.
Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
The first guy who seriously composed for the string quartet was Joseph Haydn.  His employer, a man who could hire a composer and an orchestra, nevertheless wanted a piece of music specific to the four instrument that he and his three guests played.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
On a tangent off the discussion of agriculture -- many readers underestimate the impact of your family on your means of earning funds, historically.
Read more... )
marycatelli: (Default)
There is nothing quite reading online chatter to discover what people don't know.  Like those fans who were deeply indignant at the kingdom in Tangled going to execute Flynn Rider.  After all, he was only a thief.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Roman Campagna)
"The past is a different country.  They do things differently there."  Except, of course, when they don't.

I was thinking about writing a post about that proverb.  Now I am going to write a post about the gentle art of distinguishing when it is and is not appropriate, because when that was in my mind, I happened on something else.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (God Speed)
By which I do not mean that world-building, too, can be a form of vacuuming the cat --- which I kinda take for granted.

No, what I mean is when a writer goes to tell a story, often retelling a story, in, say, a SF future.  The problem is that the social hierarchy required is not -- futuristic.  Indeed, it's rather more often seen in the past than in the present.  Or perhaps it requires that there be servants.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Default)
One thing that happens with reading lots of primary sources and getting into worlds unlike your own is that it gives you bright ideas for story.

Then it gives you a conundrum on how to convince your readers of the idea.

Read more... )

connections

Aug. 5th, 2012 05:21 pm
marycatelli: (Baby)
Another post on Things That Are Difficult to Convey in World-Building.

The vast importance of connections in most societies.  Your parents, your siblings, your cousins -- first, second, third, seventh, once, twice, thrice removed -- your godparents, your foster family, your in-laws. . . all are vital, and what's more, unproblematically so.  The term "nepotism" comes from the medieval era not because the practice started there but because that's where it first began to be seen as a problem.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (God Speed)
Being another philosophical mediation on stuff it is hard to convey to the modern audience -- namely whether the king has the power to legislate.  (I think I've been on a power trip in my posts lately.)

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Default)
Some of the hardest things to convey to a reader is a mindset different from his in a way where he never thought they might.  Like, say, aesthetic theory.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
When filling in the world, you don't need to just inclue the reader about the characters and their backstory, you need to fill in the backdrop.  The world, its social structure, its politics, etc.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
Some writers could stand to do a bit more research before they set up their marriage and wedding customs. . . .

For one thing, very, very, very few cultures allowed the couple to meet, decide to marry, and do it.  And the alternative is not an arranged marriage where the bride and bridegroom have no say.  I saw a movie taking place in (allegedly) ancien regime France, where a young man was in love, and so he was going off to ask the girl to marry him, and his father sent him off with his mother's ring.  Not going to happen.  Assuming you wanted to do something so scandalous as marry for love (and there was a scandal in ancien regime France about a couple who fell in love after they married, but then, love is blind), what he would have done is go to his father, and plead his case.  Given that his father was agreeable, what would happen next is that the father would go to the girl's father and say I think our two young folks would make a suitable match, they would duke out the financial stuff -- and the financial stuff gets very short shrift from many writers -- and then they can bring off the match.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
Did I mention this while talking about reading primary source?  No I did not.  I ought to amend that. . . .

One common error in reading primary sources is that people don't report what's normal in their lives.  If someone writes a letter saying, "I was up at six this morning." and you want to know what time she normally got up -- this is evidence that it wasn't six.  At least, normally.

Unless for some reason she was being unusually scrupulous about reporting her days.  Ah, the delights of reading between the lines.

Read more... )

Believers

Jul. 29th, 2008 09:16 pm
marycatelli: (Default)
One rule I have noticed that many writers neglect:

Believers in a religion will believe in it.

I am amazed at how many religious believers do not believe in fiction -- it's obvious even from the outside.

The worst is the Pillar of the Community who is called a Fundamentalist. You can tell from the word go that he's a child molester, merely because the writer obviously hates him so much, but I've never seen one that even vaguely smelled like a Fundamentalist.

Profile

marycatelli: (Default)
marycatelli

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
8 9 10 11 12 1314
15 16 1718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 01:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios