marycatelli: (Baby)
In Paris to the Moon, Adam Gopnik recounts how, when his wife became pregnant in Paris -- a girl, after they had had a boy -- everyone kept saying, "Le choix du roi!" until he finally snapped when a taxi driver said it and demanded to know what it meant.
Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
What would a society be like if it contained species of intelligent beings -- which, being species, could not interbreed with each other?

A lot of SF and fantasy writers don't like the problem.  You get the most improbable abilities to interbreed, even among beings that evolved independently in separate star systems.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
I have heard the principle of Chesterton's Fence propounded in many places.  Explaining to young lawyers why a confusing wording and an apparently superfluous clause should be taken seriously and not just junked.  Discussing why certain aspects of the tax code are the way they are.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
Ran across a tidbit about the False Dmitriys -- one of whom actually reigned as Tsar for some time, claiming to be the the youngest son of Ivan the Terrible.  The tidbit was that the Russian Orthodox Church prohibited more than three marriages, and so Dmitriy was actually technically illegitimate.  (Even though "Terrible" means "Inspiring Terror" -- still he went through a lot of brides.)

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
Got thrown out of a pseudo-medieval-setting book recently. . . the heroine didn't want to get married.  Her friend laughed at the very notion, but no, she didn't want to. . .

And this in a culture where she might as well have said that she didn't want to curtsey to the king.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
Being pondering the question of societies reproducing themselves lately.  It's a complex question, and not just in that you have to watch for population sizes.  Not that writers always manage to do that. . . .

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Baby)
A further reflection on one of jordan's essays that I've already pondered. . .  but two other discussions I've seen have sent me whirling off on a completely different tangent to it.

In it, he observes
Superbeings would of necessity in any system of government evolve into a sort of aristocracy.


Well, in one sense, yes, but in another, it would turn on: are these abilities of theirs hereditary?

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Rapunzel)
Despite the title, this was about the lower classes as much as the middle classes -- the unglamorous work classes.

Urban fantasy has more, of course.  Though one panelist told of a work where we had a scene of peasant women working their fingers to the bone to make a blanket for the princess, and then the princess tore it to shreds -- to be sure, because it was a bribe to her to keep her quiet and out of the way, but still. . . . .

Read more... )
marycatelli: (Rapunzel)
Writers discussing the differences between the hero's journey and the heroine's.

Read more... )
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
I was on this one.

The title's odd.  What it was about was whether planets would have single governments.

I mentioned in the introduction that there are aesthetic reasons to have a single government to clear clutter out of the way, but the panel concentrated on the centripedal and centrifugal forces.

Read more... )

scarcity

Nov. 19th, 2010 01:33 am
marycatelli: (Reading Desk)

What would men be without women?  Scarce, sir. . . mighty scarce.

Mark Twain

marycatelli: (A Birthday)
One world building error that I find as often in SF as in fantasy:  many, many, many writers neglect to figure out Where Babies Come From and Why It Matters.
Read more... )

Update: I am now screening comments to this to prevent its going off on tangents.  Even non-tangential things will get unscreened as I have time to deal with them.
marycatelli: (A Birthday)
Two screeds on the topic:

Against Tiny Kung Fu Women: A Polemic

and

Verisimilitude and the Woman Warrior, With Some Relevance to Fantasy Tropes

Me, when I put a woman in battle, she's either a wizard or a cringing little thing who thereby lures the other guy into dropping his guard and then stabs him.

But I notice that in the discussion of fighting, no one mentions the real reason why the women weren't fighting.

Because they were either pregnant or nursing, neither of which mix well with war.  On average, a woman in medieval Europe was pregnant ten times.  This resulted in, on average, two children who lived to adulthood.  Took up a good chunk of her adulthood that way.

Sure, you can finesse it, most pseudo-medieval settings do have some kind of healing, but then, as long as it's pastoral, they are going to want more children.  More hands to work. Your only form of old-age insurance.  etc.

Besides, childbirth is hazardous to the health.  Why should women have risk their lives on the battlefield, too?

Profile

marycatelli: (Default)
marycatelli

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 78 9 101112
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 05:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios